JMP0X1B Research

PAPER-009 / June 6, 2026 / corrected September 18, 2026

Replication and Falsification of Piezoelectric Strain-Driven Superconductivity in Composite Coated Wires

A materials protocol for testing the experimentally concrete Pais claim family.

01 / Abstract

Abstract

This paper converts the Pais piezoelectricity-induced room- and high-temperature superconductor patent claims into a quantitative materials protocol proposal. The protocol separates low resistance, zero resistance, Meissner response, critical current, magnetic hysteresis, and contact artifacts.

No samples or measurements are released. A null result is expected and publishable. A positive result requires calibrated transport and magnetic bounds, critical-current and critical-field scans, blind reruns, and independent replication.

02 / Hypotheses

Nested Tests

The protocol rejects contact, thermal, instrumentation, and micro-welding artifacts before considering transient or full superconducting states.

  1. H0 Artifact Resistance drops are caused by contacts, heating, nonlinear conduction, or instrumentation bandwidth.
  2. H1 Strain Vibration tunes known superconductors or ordinary resistivity, without creating a new superconducting phase.
  3. H2 Transient Pulsed current plus strain creates a short-lived low-resistance state without a full magnetic signature.
  4. H3 Full A resistance upper bound below the locked floor, magnetic shielding above threshold, resolved critical current and field, and blind independent replication appear together.

03 / Measurements

Transport Plus Magnetic Evidence

The strongest claim cannot rest on transport alone. The coated-wire system needs four-terminal measurements, thermal and strain diagnostics, susceptibility, magnetization, and blind contact swaps.

\[ R(t)=\frac{V_{23}(t)}{I_{14}(t)} \]
\[ \chi_{\mathrm{ac}}(\omega) =\frac{M(\omega)}{H(\omega)} \]

04 / Files

Paper Files

The PDF is generated from the LaTeX source. Both are published for auditability and future revision.