
% Auto-generated working paper draft for research.jmp0x1b.com
% Build: pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode paper-019-a-strain-electrodynamics-materials-atlas-for-piezoelectric-superconductivity-cla.tex

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{lastpage}
\hypersetup{colorlinks=true, linkcolor=black, urlcolor=black, citecolor=black}
\setlist[itemize]{leftmargin=1.2em}
\setlist[enumerate]{leftmargin=1.4em}
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{protocol}{Protocol}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhf{}
\lhead{JMP0X1B Research}
\rhead{Working paper draft}
\cfoot{\thepage\ of \pageref{LastPage}}
\sloppy

\title{\Large Paper 019\\[0.6em]\textbf{A Strain-Electrodynamics Materials Atlas for Piezoelectric Superconductivity Claims}\\[0.3em]\large Separating contact artifacts, strain tuning, transient conduction, and full superconducting evidence}
\author{JMP0X1B Research Group}
\date{Working paper draft / June 13, 2026}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
The coated-wire superconductivity replication protocol defines nested hypotheses from artifact to full superconducting evidence. This paper extends it into a materials atlas. The atlas varies wire composition, piezoelectric coating, strain waveform, current pulse, temperature, magnetic field, and contact geometry. Each sample becomes a signed data product with transport, magnetic, thermal, and strain channels. The intended result is a publishable negative atlas or a clearly escalated anomaly candidate.
\end{abstract}

\noindent\textbf{Status.} Draft manuscript for review and revision. This paper is not an empirical claim of new physics or field-ready technology. It is a structured proposal, theory note, protocol, or application architecture intended to be auditable, falsifiable, and publishable with source.

\tableofcontents
\newpage

\section{Problem}
Unverified superconductivity claims can waste effort unless the replication space is structured. A single sample and a single resistance trace cannot distinguish contact improvement, micro-welding, heating, ordinary strain tuning, transient conduction, and superconductivity. The problem is to design a sample matrix that rejects mundane explanations before escalating any result.

\section{Model}
Let a sample be a tuple of substrate, coating, interface preparation, strain coupling, contacts, and measurement schedule. The atlas organizes samples by controlled changes in one factor at a time, with blind contact swaps and magnetic readout as required escalation criteria.


\[
  S=(M_{\mathrm{wire}},M_{\mathrm{coat}},\Gamma_{\mathrm{interface}},\epsilon(t),I(t),T,B,C_{\mathrm{contact}}).
\]
\[
  H_3 \Rightarrow R\to 0 \;\wedge\; \chi_{\mathrm{dia}}<0 \;\wedge\; J_c>J_{c,\min}\;\wedge\;\partial R/\partial B \ne 0 .
\]


\section{Claims}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Claim 1.} A materials atlas is superior to a one-off replication because it can expose systematic artifact families.
\item \textbf{Claim 2.} Transport anomalies should not be promoted without magnetic evidence and field dependence.
\item \textbf{Claim 3.} Blind contact swaps are a low-cost way to detect the most common false positives.
\item \textbf{Claim 4.} A null atlas can still yield useful space technology data on coatings, joints, cryogenic cycling, and vibration durability.
\end{enumerate}

\section{Evidence Plan}
The evidence plan uses a staged sample matrix. Stage A validates instruments on known superconductors and non-superconductors. Stage B tests coated wires under strain without exotic interpretation. Stage C adds pulsed current and magnetic diagnostics. Stage D, reached only after predeclared gates, repeats promising samples across laboratories.

\section{JMP0X1B Implementation Surface}
JMP0X1B can represent sample recipes, lab procedures, instrument telemetry, blind labels, and evidence gates as typed artifacts. The atlas should prevent cherry-picking by committing sample batches and analysis plans before measurement.

\subsection*{Illustrative JMP0X1B-style contract}
\begin{verbatim}
record SampleRecipe { wire: Material, coating: Material, interface: Process, contact: ContactPlan, blind_id: Text }
fn escalate(sample: SampleRecord) -> HypothesisGate effects{Statistics, Provenance, Audit} {
    require(sample.transport.four_terminal)
    require(sample.magnetics.available)
    return classify_nested(sample)
}
\end{verbatim}


\section{Release And Review Plan}
Release sample recipe schemas, calibration datasets, negative results, and failed contact configurations. Do not publish a positive claim unless transport, magnetic, thermal, and independent replication gates are all satisfied.

\section{Open Questions}
\begin{itemize}
\item Which coating parameters most often change contact resistance without changing bulk state?
\item Can high-frequency strain be calibrated inside opaque coatings?
\item What minimum magnetic signal is required for escalation?
\item How should destructive post-mortem microscopy be sequenced?
\end{itemize}

\section{Conclusion}
The atlas makes superconductivity replication less dramatic and more useful. Its strongest expected product is a negative map that prevents future teams from repeating weak claims.

\section*{References}
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{jmp009} JMP0X1B Research Group. \emph{Replication and Falsification of Piezoelectric Strain-Driven Superconductivity in Composite Coated Wires}. Working paper, 2026. \url{https://research.jmp0x1b.com/papers/piezoelectric-superconductivity-replication.html}
\bibitem{jmp011} JMP0X1B Research Group. \emph{From Speculative Superconducting Claims to Practical Spacecraft Power and Magnetic Subsystems}. Working paper, 2026. \url{https://research.jmp0x1b.com/papers/superconducting-spacecraft-subsystems.html}
\bibitem{wilkinson} M. D. Wilkinson et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. \emph{Scientific Data}, 3:160018, 2016.
\bibitem{prov} World Wide Web Consortium. \emph{PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model}. W3C Recommendation, 2013. \url{https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/}
\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
